I have heard a lot of questions, statements, and overall chatter recently about solid food recommendations for babies. Solid foods meaning baby cereal, baby food, basically anything besides breast milk or formula. Over the past decade, we all know this has changed several times, heck since I had my 2 year old, till the time my youngest was born, the time frame for introducing infant cereal was changed by an entire month. Doesn’t seem like a lot, but a month can make a difference to some children, and parents.
Right now, the pediatric recommendation for introducing solid foods to your baby is nothing before 6 months old. This is not because professionals want your baby to starve, or because they want you to spend thousands of dollars in formula, or even because they want you to feel like a 24/7 cow breastfeeding. It is because introducing solid food before this time frame can impact your infant negatively, and even cause lifelong dietary issues such as food allergies, digestive issues, and all that fun stuff.
What originally sparked my post was reading on websites like Mamapedia, and Cafemom and seeing the increasing amount of mothers who are not following these recommendations, and it seems as though most of the same women end up with children that have high numbers of food allergies, and other issues that could be directly related to the foods they fed to their children before the 6 month recommendation.
Now, many of the reasons for these recommendations are because of trial and error with generations younger than us, and our children. I continue to hear “Well my parents did it and we are fine!” No, we are not fine at all! We have huge numbers of diabetics in our generation, higher now that any generation before us. We have more food allergies, more digestive issues, heart disease, etc. Not fine by any means.
So what are the current recommendations?
No solid foods before 4-6 months of age.
Your baby is not physically ready for solid foods because of the way their tongue processes the things that come into their mouth. Which is why a strictly liquid diet until that point is best.
Once your baby is able to sit unassisted and reaches for things, they recommend starting solid foods.
One food at a time, waiting no shorter than one week to see if there is any kind of reaction to that food.
Veggies first, then fruits, starting with the lightest colors first.
Squash, carrots, etc… then moving onto the green beans, peas, etc.
Same goes for Fruits..
Bananas, Apples, etc. then moving to the darker colors.
Keep in mind, they do not recommend any berries until at least two years old due to concern for allergic reactions! Especially if you have family history of anyone with berry allergies.
These recommendations are not put in place to make more work for you, they are put in place to make sure your baby is getting the healthiest start in life! We all want what is best for our children, so take the extra time, go the extra mile, and really learn the in’s and out’s of feeding your baby. It can make a world of difference for their lives.
or, you can wait until they’re interested and just start them on table foods. baby-led eating for the win!
the grumbles´s last [type] ..THE TRAIN HAS NO WHEELS and yes- im yelling
Great post!
I waited until 6 months with my first. With my second, he showed no interest until almost 10 months(he’d already more than tripled his birth weight, so there was no concern there), and with my last, I waited until 6 months.
With my first, we started about 5mos because I felt pressure from our pediatrician (this is almost a decade ago). With this baby, the ped. pressure is still there, but he’s 6 1/2mos and we just started last week. At his 6mo check-up, his Dr basically took the tone that we should have started already. I said I would in about a month, but then I haven’t been able to keep baby’s hands out of my food, so caved. Tried doing a little baby-led feeding, but he’d start choking if he bit anything off, so went back to mush.
Or else I hear things like “Well my baby was eating all the time, and the formula/breastmilk just wasn’t keeping him full.”
What I *think* they are referring to is growth spurts. Having breastfed 3 babies, I can smell a growth spurt coming on because it feels like they’re attached to me 24/7. Then it ends and I feel like I’m begging her to nurse more often because I’m so engorged!! lol
That being said, Willem was started on rice cereal at 4 months. He had NO tongue thrust reflex and ate every single drop, no spit outs.
This was a desperate act of trying to figure out what would help a child, who screamed all night, sleep better. From what I found, it helped slightly… but only because he was fuller. He still woke up several times at night to nurse. But he didn’t scream as much. I still have no idea what was causing it.
You look at places like Circle of Mom’s on FB (it’s like watching a train wreck)… and they are starting their 2 WEEK OLDS on rice cereal IN THE BOTTLE. I swear I nearly dropped dead on the floor when I first read a thread about that.
I MUST share this post by my friend Sara over at Custom-Made Milk…
http://custommademilk.wordpress.com/2010/05/09/studies-change-best-practices/
mommymichael´s last [type] ..Another Nursing Is Normal post…
Screaming all night is generally reflux related I would think. Cereal can help some babies, but I don’t reccomend it because if they do reflux and aspirate, now there’s cereal in their lungs and not just breastmilk or formula. There are ways to help reflux, diet changes, hazelwood necklaces, etc.
All of my kids have food intolerances as infants/toddlers. The earliest any of them had food was 4 mos (ignorant me and trying to cut back on the amount of formula supplement I was having to use) and this latest was 8 mos. She still has a lot of food issues we have to watch and not let her have, but I am back to a normal diet for me as she’s o.k. w/ my food in my milk now (she’s 17 mos).
I will disagree on no berries before 2 though. Blueberries are actually very low allergy berries and my youngest loves them. We actually let her have strawberries too b/c we were at a loss one day of what to try next and those were available. I’d be much more concerned with nuts than I am w/ berries. Our allergist has said no nuts before age 3 because of our history.
Personally, I think it has less to do with what we feed and when than lifestyle these days. If we look at past generations, they fed their babies early and fed them foods they ate. As my father said, his generation ate everything, including growing up with raw eggs plopped into a glass of homemade wine at 5 years old. They had no health problems growing up and even into their 50′s. Why? Several reasons. First off the food was fresh. Notice, homemade wine. They grew, even in Brooklyn, a lot of their produce, and they stopped on the way home from work at the butcher or at the farms (yes in Brooklyn) and got fresh meat. In fact, often the chicken would be chosen by the buyer and slaughtered right then and there. You can’t get any more fresh than that. Hence, my dad talking about kids watching chickens run without their heads back in the day! There was no preservatives, no salt. Secondly, excercise. Everyone walked, kids were free to run the neighborhood with friends from very young ages. They went out at daybreak and didn’t stop moving until they fell into bed late at night. They ate fresh foods and they excercised. Today, kids are trapped in the house playing video games and eating processed foods. Yes, Gerber is processed foods, so if that’s starting your baby on solids, well… I know they “leave out the salt and the sugar.” Not the same thing. My grandmother fed her babies everything she fed the family, seasonings included. They were thin, healthy and had no issues. Back then very few children had allergies, it was almost unheard of.
I fed my kids young, because IMO, simply giving liquid is not sufficient. I know I wouldn’t want a glass of milk for dinner.
I think it has way more to do with culture and lifestyle today than when you start feeding your children.
In other countries, such as Portugal, they feed their children very early. Then again, my brother-in-law’s family would grow their own food, raised their own pigs and chickens and ate everything fresh with no pesticides or preservatives.
My sister visited Portugal many times. All the hogwash here in the US about not eating after a certain hour, don’t eat carbs, cut out red meat, and on and on. Well, she ate more there, at dinners at 9 p.m., ate huge lunches and huge dinners and came home 10lbs lighter. Why? They were active and ate fresh.
Over there, there was no paranoia about letting children out to play. They opened the door and out they went, all day. At 5 years old, off my nephew went, with his cousins, age 6 and 8.
I disagree. I think it is the foods, of course some of it is lifestyle, but most of it is when we are feeding our kids, and when we do. Our parents generation, even our grand parents generation was not “fine” either. They have health problems, diabetes, all of the shabang.
The way foods are made today is a huge problem too.
Only giving liquids to a child whose stomach is the size of a an apple, or measures one cup does not need a huge meal. Which is why babies are designed to be able to live
and thrive on nothing more than breast milk or liquid for the first 6 months old their life, and even longer. Some babies do not have solid foods till a year, and we don’t see them wasting away.
You cannot compare the appetite of a 6 month old to a grown adult.
I am the lazy mom. I breastfeed because I’m too lazy to deal with formula. I wait to give solid foods until the baby reaches off my plate and shoves it in to her mouth. My kids have started solids from 5-10 months. But I put my kids on mushed up versions of what we eat. I’ve only had two of six kids have any interest in mushed baby food in a jar. And those two have actually been my pickiest eaters! If you wait til baby is older and self feeding, it’s just easier and cleaner. And really…I advise all moms to be lazy and breastfeed and delay solids. ![]()
micki´s last [type] ..Menu Plan Monday-July 19
We did baby-led weaning as well, and I’m so thankful. No purees, no jarred foods, just what mama and daddy ate (within reason). It helped us to eat more healthily as well!
Delora, that gagging in my experience is a learning experience for baby. Many times, they put too much in their mouth, or pick a texture they don’t like, or they’re just not ready for that food yet. Baby should always be supervised and helped during baby-led weaning, and a bit of gagging is par for the course. That’s why it is so important for baby to choose how big the pieces of food are and which foods he wants to try.
Sara´s last [type] ..Wordless Wednesday
I’m happy to see that I am not alone in waiting beyond the recommended time to start my little ones on solids. My doctor advised us to wait as long as a year. Both babies were great nursers. Their plumpness proved they were eating just fine. Our doc said babies are designed to live on nothing but breastmilk for the first year. So we waited to introduce them to any foods until 10 months. When we started foods, they ate what we ate. It was often pureed, mushed or cubed, but otherwise they ate the same foods we did.
I was surprised to read the berry recommendation. When we decided to start our babies on solids, our doctor said we could feed them anything except honey since we have absolutely no family history of food allergies. Both kids had nuts and berries young. So far, so good. Oh, and I’m happy to report that their baby plumpness melted off once the nursing stopped and solids began. They are two healthy, happy kiddos.
My oldest didn’t start eating anything solid until 6 1/2 months and we started with rice cereal like our peso said. We stopped that pretty quickly, on her advice again, bc it made her horribly constipated. We moved to squash & sweet potatoes and went from there. We only did purred baby food until she was 10 or 11 months. I had no idea when to start her on more “solid” food! My second had a lot of health stuff going on, including multiple food intolerances, severe reflux & oral texture aversions just to name a few. She did not start any foods until around 8 months. We started with lamb and then turkey bc they are very low on the food allergy chart. We were seeing a pediatric dietician as well who helped us figure out what foods to try as well as a speech pathologist to help with her oral/texture issues. It went quite well and she is a healthy 3 year old with minimal food intolerance issues. I made all of the baby food for my second (i had to bc she needed to have only single ingredient foods in case of a reaction) and used all organic ingredients. I plan to do the same with any future children! I like knowing exactly what they are eating and how it was made. We never did any of the baby cereals (rice, oats, etc) with my second bc they are constipating & hard to digest. So are carrots & bananas. My first didn’t eat those on advice from our pedi to help avoid constipation issues and that helper, along with a jar of prunes a few times a week! I’m not a fan of jarred baby food. I think it’s important to really pay attention to everything our kids are eating!
Great topic, just wanted to add my two pence
. Although, I am not a mum yet but have cared for, studied and worked with young children since I was a child and have found that it is generally best to delay solids for as long as possible (which could be until their first birthday) provided that the child is exclusively breastfed.
As stated above breast milk is by design everything a baby needs for their first year of life, you can NOT buy a more organic, healthy, raw or nutrient packed food! I really think that in this case (of an exclusively breastfed child that is) that mums should save their money on packaged baby foods and put it towards buying more organic and unprocessed food for themselves!! After all I agree with advocates for baby led weaning that the introduction of solid food should be for the baby’s sensory exploration, the learning experience of eating (which includes gagging) and good old messy play time rather than a time where we NEED to actively feed a child for nutritional gain.
@ Micki – Hi, just wanted to say I do not think that you are lazy at all!! Both breastfeeding and preparing a healthy meal the WHOLE family ‘can’ eat daily takes considerable effort and is rarely honored or rewarded
In our consumer society we have been convinced that we need all this baby stuff to save us time whilst we are caring for infants. This is so untrue!! But that it is a sad cycle we sometimes fall into – to send our time working, so that we can buy time-saving things for infants that make up for the very time that we are unable to spend physically taking care of said infant. When in reality with eduction and above all SUPPORT (government/financial/family etc) I believe that almost ALL women would be able to breastfeed their babies until baby naturally started to wean themselves onto homemade, fresh and organic meals that do not need to be prepared separately to the rest of the family’s meals.
Well I hope this comment/ mini rant makes some sense :s! I guess that what I am trying to articulate is that, everyday I am learning in so many ways, that especially where pregnancy, birth and all aspects of baby care are concerned going “back to basics” really is best for everyone!
I know to wait till 6 months and to space out foods at first to watch for allergies… But I have NEVER heard of going from light colors to darker, or about not introducing berries till 2 yrs. Do you have any links orevidence for that, or the rationale behind those specific recommendations? I have heard of doing veggies first, but only bc of worry that sweet fruits will “spoil” a kids’ taste buds and they then won’t like veggies (which seems absurd to me).
Marcy´s last [type] ..So- hows Sacramento
I am not sure about the colors. I learned that from my Pediatrician with my youngest child. I will ask her about it next time I am in the office though.
The berries are because of allergies. Especially if you have any kind of berry allergy in your family.
Danielle– yeah, I’m just surprised as I have never heard that about berries before. I just did a search on google, and apparently in 2008 the AAP released a statement about how there may not be any sort of relationship between when you introduce foods and allergies (but still reinforcing that one should wait till AT LEAST 4 months to give any types of solids).
“There is also little evidence that delaying the timing of the introduction of complementary foods beyond 4 to 6 months of age prevents the occurrence of atopic disease. At present, there are insufficient data to document a protective effect of any dietary intervention beyond 4 to 6 months of age for the development of atopic disease.”
http://aappolicy.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/pediatrics;121/1/183
I waited as long as possible to introduce solids to my kid, mainly because I just didn’t want to deal with it, lol. I think for our next one I’ll definitely look into baby-led weaning.
Marcy´s last [type] ..So- hows Sacramento
it’s nice to see that I’m not the only one that feels this way. If more mothers were responsible in taking good care of their children and being mothers instead of “best friends”, we wouldn’t have the problems that we have with these kids.
Giving your children food before 6 months because you think that it’s cool, is not cool! Great post with great information. Keep up the good work!
Kenneth L. White´s last [type] ..Cures For Baby Constipation updated Mon Jan 3 2011 12-23 pm CST
1